...SOMERTON BEACH...
...DUSK November 30th, 1948...
We all know the story by now, some would say 'Ad nauseum'
Without going into too much detail, here are the basics of the case;
Lying on the beach at Somerton was a man in his early to mid-40s, well-built and in good physical condition. His clothing, a smart jacket, trousers or strides as they would say in SA, a white shirt with a military-looking tie and a pullover. The clothing was described as being good quality and yet he had made some repairs to the collar of the coat and I think a trouser cuff. Had it not been for those repairs, there would be little to connect the man to the suitcase that was to be found some weeks later. His shoes were noteworthy, shiny almost new and one thought was that they were custom-made.
What else do we know?
1. When examined, there were no labels on any of the clothes he was wearing they had been removed, some torn away they say.
2. He had no identification on him at all, no driver's license, no wallet, no ration card or petrol coupons, there was nothing that could identify him not even a wristwatch or marks where one had been, and no sign of a wedding ring.
3. His pockets contained a few bits and pieces and many would know the list by heart. Suffice it to say there were some indications that he may have come from America, his jacket for example had feather stitching of a kind only made in the US at that time, 2 aluminum combs, and chewing gum despite the lack of teeth. Oh yes and a sixpence. Perhaps to pay the Ferryman?
Anything else?
We know that when found on December 1st, his body was propped up a little against a low sea wall at the foot of some rickety wooden steps that led down from the Esplanade just opposite the Crippled Children's Home. According to Constable Moss who had arrived as the result of a call from local Jeweller John Lyons, the body was cold and damp and it had not been in the water. A little odd given the Spring tide early that morning, 4.34 am it reached 9 feet, the highest tide of the year.
Later research by myself and local but Internationally renowned tidal expert, Dr. John Luick, found that the tide that morning would probably have reached the low sea wall against which the man was found propped. ( A nod here to John Sanders who had actually made mention of the unusual tides issue early in the piece) I say probably because according to John Luick, the only way we could be 100% certain would have been to have had a movie camera filming the event. What we did find was that in an almost identical tidal pattern, the tide would have come right up to the wall and this was a 7 foot 6 inch tide.
This tide issue was all the more puzzling by the fact that Dr. Bennet, the Doctor who had pronounced life extinct made it clear that the man had died at around 2 am that morning. yet somehow he had made his way down to the beach which could only have been after the high tide that occurred at 4.34 am.
And the cause of death?
But apart from suspicions, no definitive cause of death was recorded.
Was this a suicide or was it murder?
By sheer coincidence apart from the possibility of being a well-planned suicide, the MO (or Modus Operandi) is an exact fit for an equally well-planned assassination. Untraceable poisons were the hallmark of Soviet assassinations.From an earlier post regarding Soviet Assassinations:
...and US ones, extrajudicial.
ReplyDeleteIt was the Cold War era
with different rules
Paranoia. Dr Stangelove
A good point but the US never did use poison as an assassination weapon. True to say that they created some untraceable poisons but you'll find on record an ex KGB man saying that the Soviets used it but the Americans were to scared to.
ReplyDeleteThe general rule for Soviet assassinations was bullets in Russian controlled territories and poisons for comintern locations. This post has been updated with information regarding the use of Poisons by the Soviets in the Cold War.
Here's another link to review:
https://tamamshud.blogspot.com/2019/11/any-fool-can-commit-murder-but-it-takes.html
Statistics are interesting. In this case the stats surrounding suicide rates, genders and cause of death.
ReplyDeleteI followed up on those stats some 9 years ago. I was looking for the incidence of suicide between 1945 and 1950 for males in the 40 to 50 age group where poison was the cause of death. There was one more factor, the location type as in city, suburb, regional and coastal for the latter read 'beach'. It turned out that the age group had the lowest rate of suicide for males. It also turned out that suicide by poison and at a coastal location was a rare event. In SA in 1948 I could find only 1 plus the Somerton Man but his death was not recorded as suicide due to the Coroners finding. For the researchers out there if you can find more please let me know. Source of historical stats being ABS.
The only problem that I see with Dr John Barkly Bennett's estimation of time of death is that he is actually related to Dorothy jean Webb nee Robertson, the alleged widow of Carl Webb. If indeed the corpse that he examined was Carl Webb, then I ask how did he not identify him there and then, and notify Dorothy?
ReplyDeleteI also query whether he already had knowledge of events directly from Dorothy and thus made sure that he was the Doctor on shift at the time to intercept any bodies coming into the Hospital?
Thus he had the ability if he had pre-existing knowledge of events to do certain things, such as removing identifiable documents and falsification of his estimated time of death to protect Dorothy from suspicion in the death of Carl Webb.
You got it in the first paragraph
ReplyDeleteSomerton man isn't Carl Webb
But try convincing the hordes out there who have been brainwashed
That would seem to be the simplest explanation and it does take away from Dr John Barkly Bennett any suspicion that he conspired to cover up anything.
DeleteAgreed, it would be a highly unlikely scenario for Dr Bennett to be involved in any form of cover up.
DeleteI agree with petedavo in the doctor's likely non involvement in the as yet mysterious death of SM (sans Carl Webb). A million to one co-incidence is my take, but a co-incidence no less.
ReplyDeleteThere's certainly broad agreement on that. Webb was not the Somerton Man and the whole conversation surrounding that claim served very little purpose.
ReplyDeleteIn the end we will no doubt hear from the SA Coroner and he will have the last word of course.
We can drop the Carl Webb farce, as indeed at least one of those pushing the single rootless hair identification has most assuredly done. Back to long odds of the Dr. J. Bennett and Somerton Man relativity factor reminds one of Det. R. A. Leane's stated million to one odds of finding a Rubaiyat with it's T/S slip missing; Then a day or two later it turns up in the hands of chemist Freeman who just so happens is known to the inquirer. No co-incidence there.
ReplyDeleteTotally agree, we've been saying that here since October or November of last year. Finally, the message is registering.
ReplyDeleteDo you recall our brief meeting in Adelaide GC?
ReplyDeleteYes, interesting discussion. Did you come up with anything new?
ReplyDeleteIf you wanted to have a body found on the beach and didn’t want to be seen taking it there. And of course you didn’t want the body to be soaked. How would you get it there? Simple really, spies were good at deception and magic.
ReplyDeleteI agree, they were and are lateral thinkers and it is known that they received training from professional magicians.
ReplyDeleteBack to your question, as we discussed last year (in fact it was discussed back in 2009 on the old FB page and probably earlier), there is only one other way and that's by boat. The tide being what it was that night it would not have been too difficult to bring a shallow draft boat in to the beach a short distance to the wall. Not hard for two people to lift a body out, walk the last few metres and prop him up against the wall then shive off back to wherever you came from. Pure conjecture but a reasonable possibility, one of only two in fact, the other is to have man handled the body down the steps or along the path to the beach just north of the Crippled Children's Home, that would have been no easy task with the possibility of someone seeing the event.
You would need someone on the beach or roadway to let you know if the coast was clear (no pun intended). Similarly you'd need them around until you shoved off. Three people or at least that, as you say, is the possibility. A tinny would do the job. Who do we know that had a tinny back then?
ReplyDeleteThe theory has a bit going for it, there would be nothing unusual about a small boat just off shore or even parked up for a few minutes. All they would need is 3 or 4 minutes and job done. As for who had tinnies probably hundreds or thousands :) Shallow turning tide, no footprints or undue disturbance of the sand around the body. It fits well with the Spring Tide Posts, we had found that for the body to have been dry, he must have been put there after the high spring tide, highest tide of the year. Here's the link:
ReplyDeletehttps://tamamshud.blogspot.com/2021/04/the-shifting-sands-of-somerton-beach.html