VERSE 70 INSCRIPTION
THE ALF BOXALL/JESTYN
RUBAIYAT
The following images provide in some detail, the incredible skill of the person who wrote the Verse 70 inscription found in the Alf Boxall copy of the Rubaiyat. These images from the Boxall book provides evidence that links Alf Boxall, Jess Harkness, and the Somerton Man. It confirms the view that this blog has held since the outset that the Somerton Man Cold Case, (Tamam Shud case), was and is an Espionage case.
Below you see two main images and close up examples of the inscription, both are from the same base image and both had been treated with the lemon juice ink removal technique. The slight differences in clarity for the two are the result of diluting the fluid with 20% water, the top image, and 33% in the lower image. They are named TR and TL on the files.
1. TR
1. TR
2. TL
MICROCODE
Every word and marking un the inscription contains microcode. It would have taken hours to complete and that is one of the reasons why I believe that the Boxall version of the book containing as it does numerous concealment methods, was in fact a training manual
CLOSE UP IMAGES
The images below are marked TR and TL dependent on which of the two main images they came from.
The image to the right is the dash found in line 2 of the written verse, it follows the word Swore...
The signature, Jestyn, is shown on the right...
More images will be added in the coming days.
In the meantime, here's a tutorial for those uncertain about how the process works, there is a full-screen option next to the cog in the player controls beneath the slides:
Tags
Alf Boxall
Jess Harkness. Espionage
Rubaiyat of Omar Khayam
somerton man code
Somerton Man Mystery
tamam shud case
Pete, I recognise, that the work that has been done here, has totally changed the narrative surrounding the Somerton Man case. A lot of work has been put in by a lot of people and that has now been superseded by the discovery of a simple technique proven to remove super thin layers of ink, in this case from Verse 70 and the Code page as well as the torn piece.
ReplyDeleteEveryone is of course entitled to their opinions and that's as it should be. However there can only be one truth, one set of facts which we can either accept or deny. The best advice I can offer is that if you are presented with a set of facts with which you disagree, then you should first test what has been put forward and then formulate any questions.
To help people get to grips with this development, I have put a short slide based tutorial together and it shows step by step how the process works, it's been added to the post above. I hope this helps. I wish you well.