SOMERTON MAN MYSTERY

The Evidence The Facts In Detail In Depth

WHAT HAPPENED THAT NIGHT? UPDATED 10th DECEMBER 2020, 2 NEW PHOTOS



1. PHOTO OF THE BEACH AND LOCATION OF THE BODY SHOWING THE TIDE ACTION:





What's most interesting about this photo is, of course, the action of the tide and just how close into where the sea wall was in late 1948. You might just make out the X that marks the spot. I do not know exactly when this pic was taken but I will endeavour to find out.

It was from the Littlemore NAA file so it may date to 1977 but it could be earlier. If this wasn't a particularly high tide as it was on the night of November 30th/December 1st 1948, then it could be that the tide on that night being at 8 feet, would have swamped the area where the body was found at around 4.30 am. but then receded. That of course has implications as to when the body might have been placed there? 

2. Second Pic slightly different perspective:




The ranges in the distance look further away in this shot taken from a similar location as the previous photo. Cameras do funny things to perspectives and aspects.

A step by step account of how and when this man died..


Our concern is not the lead up to the events during the day of 30th November so much as it is the events of the night, 30th November to 1st December 1948 in Somerton.

With many thanks to Clive and to a fellow commenter and researcher for their input. It has been invaluable as usual.





1. The man was spotted about twilight, around 7.30 pm on the evening of 30th November 1948. A local Jeweller and his wife saw him lying with his head and shoulders propped up against the low sea wall near to some steps down to the beach that led down from The Esplanade just about opposite the Crippled Children's Home. The man was also seen by a young couple who were seated just a few yards away to the man's left and slightly above and behind him. There was another unknown person who was seen to be watching the man from the roadway above.

2. The known witnesses had left the scene by 8 pm, there is no record of when the other watcher moved away.

3. It was now dark and we believe that at sometime between 8 pm and 11 pm, the man was removed from his location on the beach. He was a big man, he would possibly have had to have been subdued and then manhandled from his position against the wall.


This photograph is from the 1948 Sands & Macdougall Glenelg Street Directory,. You can see the various huts dotted along the beach right out to the small promontory which is situated on the North end of the Esplanade in Somerton.

4. Not often discussed is the presence of a number of beach huts along the beach/shoreline between Glenelg and Somerton Beach, it is possible that the man was taken to one of those huts where he was later given his massive overdose of Digitalis. Alternatively, he was taken up to the roadway above the beach location, bundled into a car and taken to another location, possibly a nearby house and the drug or drugs administered there. The scratched knuckles on the man's left hand may have been the result of the struggle to get him away from the beach.

5. We now need to consider and work backwards from the time the body of the man was examined by at the hospital by Dr. Bennett. According to him, the man had died no more than 8 hours before he examined the body at approximately 9.45 a.m. on 1st December 1948.

6. We also know from a copy of a 2010 Autopsy report on the body of a man who had committed suicide with a massive overdose of Digitalis, that death occurs 1 hour after the ingestion of the overdose. (More from this document later in this post)

7. Having established a timeframe, we can now make a reasonable assumption that the man took the drugs between 12.30 am and 2.30 am on 1st December 1948.

8. That puts his time of death at between 1.30 am and 3.30 am on 1st December 1948.

9. Following his death, it is further assumed that the man was cleaned up removing traces of vomit and blood, he was then dressed in the clothes that they found him wearing but quite possibly the trousers were changed. This would have added, say, a further 1 hour to the process.


This image, taken in 1948, was given to me by a lady whose parents were in the original photograph and she asked for them to be removed. This lady is a long-time resident of Glenelg. The image was taken close to the Ferris Avenue junction with The Esplanade.  To the right you can see the Crippled Children's Home as arrowed and also arrowed is a diagonal ramp down from The Esplanade. The ramp shared a common entrance from The Esplanade with a similar diagonal ramp that led down to a location near to where the Somerton Man was found which is closer to Bickford Terrace. See the next image and map below.

In this image believed to have been taken in 1944, you can see a down ramp arrowed
to the left.


10. Working with our assumed timeframe, we think that the man's body was taken back to the beach where he had been seen the previous evening. Again, being a big man and this time a dead weight, the task would have taken at least 2 people. In fact, you may consider that a 3rd person would have been needed as a lookout during the move.

11. That timeframe would mean that he was taken back to the same location on Somerton Beach after 2.30 am and before daylight om 1st December 1948.

12 A part smoked cigarette was placed in his mouth to give the impression that he had smoked it there and added to the illusion that he hadn't been moved.



'Any fool can commit a murder but it takes an artist to commit a perfect natural death'

More to follow...




13 Comments

Hi
Welcome to the Tamam Shud Blog, widely regarded as the leading and most trusted fact and evidence-based blog on the Somerton Man case. Please take a moment to review our comment guidelines here:

https://tamamshud.blogspot.com/p/tamam-shud-blog-rules.html

Visit our YouTube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOamLze8PyNDafjjBGGngJQ

  1. Hew image showing tide action at Somerton Beach posted here...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Are you certain that picture is from the same place? it looks a LOT further South - can't be certain with the graininess, but the hilly peninsula looks WAY too close to be Somerton

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, fairly certain, look at the Norfolk Island Pine and it's proximity to the largish building which has the same chimney arrangement as the Crippled Children's Home. I have another photo similar to the current one but slightly different aspect and will post that shortly. The focus and lens used have a way of bringing the background ranges in closer.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gordon, There was a third set of stairs down to the beach adj the intersection of Bickford Tce and the Esplanade, similar to the one adj the Ferris Ave intersection (not as wide though). Those stairs (running down perpendicular to the esplanade) appear to be the ones featured in the photo showing the beach, stairs, low sea wall with the X, the bench on low promenade, and Crippled Children's Home above. This would put the location of SM's body further south than you have depicted on your map. Also in early 1949 the Crippled Childrens Home had one single access ramp that ran diagonal down to the beach in a NW direction only. This started up on the road halfway between Ferris and Bickford, basically straight across the road from the C.C. Home driveway off the Esplanade. Hope this is helpful. Regards, Thomas

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks Thomas, that's valuable additional information. Appreciated. I noted 2 down ramps, the one in the coloured pic with gaps shows, I think the one you refer to?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks Gordon, 2nd pic is definitely (a little bit - maybe only 100m or so) further away (the ranges are smaller as are the trees). Still not convinced the location is accurate, though (the presence of the second tree behind the house bothers me a bit too - granted we can't tell how far it is, but unless it's fairly close it must be a pretty big tree)

    But between this post and Thomas' I've just realised GoogleMaps might actually be correct. Until now, I actually thought the body was found at the end Bickford Tce, but I Suddenly think it was just North of Ferris Ave. BUT I don't think the photo with the people redacted is of the same house either (location of the tree, shape of house don't look consistent, and the Crippled Children's house had a road up the LHS (as you face it) - which until now I thought was Bickford, but in fact I think was Ferris.
    To me the kicker for this realisation was GoogleStreetview - I thoguht it was a bit odd that the NI Pine had been removed (I know time has passed, but those things are around forever) - because there isn't one facing South near Bickford.....but there is near Ferris.

    All of that being said, perspective is tricky.
    In the "official" pic the pine looks to the Left of the house (with the telgraph pole between the house and tree).
    In the redacted pic it looks like the tree might be just Right of the center house (with the telegraph pole to the left of it)
    In the 1944 Pic the tree looks well Right of the house with the post slightly right.

    So clearly the direction the photo was taken in makes a MASSIVE difference.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Confirm Ferris. Low wall and path to children's Home entrance is still in situ on Google Street View.

      Delete
  7. I think there's an aerial pic, low level, looking South along the coastline from Glenelg towards Somerton and Brighton. Will see if it is handy, it was a pretty dark image so will have to lighten it a little.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Do you think the Somerton Man had been given some poison before 7:30 but the people responsible discovered he wasn’t dead and took him away to give him more poison? (Sorry if this has been answered already).

    ReplyDelete
  9. Quite honestly I haven't heard of that as a possibility. the only thoughts I and others have had were about his either being moved and returned but with no known reason or it was a different man as in man 1 was removed and man 2 takes his place at a later time. Having said that, your thoughts are perfectly sound and I see no reason why they shouldn't be included in the discussion, good thinking Trina!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If it was a different man the second time, were the assassins killing two men perhaps? Too bad there weren’t any surveillance cameras then.

      Delete
  10. PETE. I understand that you were banned from the US forum last week. I was sorry to see that, what you should know is that someone reported you but it quite definitely was not me and I really don't know who it was.
    I can see that you're very upset about it, what I read in your latest comments about this blog and the work I have done here, is that you are in a lot of pain and that saddens me.

    I wish you well and I am sure that you'll work through it.


    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post
/body>