SUSPECTS NAMED
This blog has been a an experience, a long, long road to hoe. With diversions and rabbit holes we nevertheless have kept going and kept the focus. Who was the man on the beach on December 1st 1948? How did he die? Who killed him?
Without wasting any further time, let's get on with the job:
WHO WAS HE?
Note 'facemask' shadowing around the nose and mouth in the center image. It is not a 'saddle nose' it is a shadow |
Let me stress that Pavel Ivanovich Fedosimov is the name that the man in the photograph was given by the press agency and it is believed that this was a pseudonym. According to Vassiliev's notes, Pavel Fedosimov was recalled to Russia because he was suspected of being about to defect. He was due to board the POBEDA in New York on 31st July 1948 but none of the boarding documents were certificated, there is no proof that he was on board when the ship sailed. The headmaster of the Soviet school in New York, Michael Samarin, his wife and 3 children along with Oksana Kasenkina a teacher from the school, also booked to travel to Odessa, did not board and in fact asked for asylum, they all defected.
(The voyage of the Pobeda was marred as it approached Odessa, its final destination. There was a large explosion on board, 40 passengers and two crew were killed. On hearing of the incident, Stalin flew into a rage and blamed US spies for the disaster.)
The bottom line is that there was no proof that Fedosimov boarded the Pobeda, the photograph I have is the only photograph of this man known to be in existence. A person of this name was recorded as being a Soviet envoy at the UN for a number of years from the late 1940s through to 1965, however, no photographs exist of this man either. Clive Turner requested photographs and file details of Pavel Ivanovich Fedosimov from the CIA and the last response he had was 'We can neither confirm nor deny that Pavel Fedosimov had any dealings with the CIA'
A comparison overlay video of the image you see here showed a marked resemblance to the Somerton Man.
In the absence of any photographs of this man after 1947 and any photographs of the man of the same name attached to the UN, I am led to believe that the man in this photograph was a Soviet defector and may well be the Somerton Man.
It was and probably still is common practice for Russian agents to use pseudonyms. In fact, later in this post we talk of a Bogdan Stashinky, he spoke of the list of pseudonyms he had for use in various locations.
HOW DID HE DIE?
As per the previous post and its comments, I believe that the man was assassinated, that a sophisticated 'vapour' gun was likely used to carry out the killing.
Much discussion regarding the drug Digitalis, has resulted in an understanding that it was a drug if taken in a heavy dose can kill within seconds and this was substantiated with a copy of an autopsy report of a man who had ended his life in this way. We also know that Digitalis can be delivered by syringe and by default it could be delivered in a vapour form. This conforms to the opinions expressed at the 1949 autopsy and the Phillips document in 1994.
Importantly, no trace of the drug was found in the body, which is believed to have been a conscious decision by the assassin to deliberately cover up the nature of the death and make it look like a suicide.
This was a stated method used by the NKVD, to use their phraseology, 'Anyone can commit murder but it takes an artist to commit a natural death'
WHO KILLED HIM?
A number of people would fall into the category of suspects with a suspect being someone who either carried out the deed or was involved in its planning.
This list is not exhaustive, it is focused on people who either had a history of such killings in their credits or who, by circumstance, could well have been involved in the event.
1. SHERBAKOV, arrived in Darwin around 26th November 1948 with the Russian delegation to the Lapstone conference due to start on December 1st 1948. Sherbakov was never seen or heard of again after his brief appearance in Darwin
UPDATE. Photograph of Sherbakov found:
An Olympic Boxer, extremely fit, born 1919. Ex Special Forces with experience in WW2. |
2. BOGOTYREVA. A secretary to the delegation leader, a Miss Bogotyreva, Miss Bogotyreva was never heard of or seen again along with Sherbakov
3. PAVEL SUDOPLATOV, a senior NKVD man with a record of involvement in assassinations including that of LEON TROTSKY and the use of specialised poisons. Interestingly, Pavel worked in the same battle area as Feosimov in the years 42 to 35 and in a similar role. He worked closely with Mairanovski, (see the next point below), on the development of secret assassination weapons and planning. It was in this laboratory that the single barrel and later double-barrel vapour guns were developed and issued to various assassins.
4. NIKOLAI EVGENEVIECH KHOKHLOV..
Defected to the US in 1954 amidst a fanfare of press
and public, Nikolai was a trained assassin, a Captain in the KGB at the time of his defection, he had been active within the NKVD through WW2 and the id to late 40s. Not much is known of his activities but he was a known Soviet agent with assassination skills. He himself was subject to an assassination attempt in 1957, it was the first time that the Soviets had used a radioactive substance, Thallium, for this purpose.
5. GRIGORY MAIRANOVSKY, head of Department No.1, he headed up the laboratory focused on the development of secret poisons for the NKVD. He was personally involved in the assassination of Isiah Oggins, a US-born soviet spy.
Mairanovsky tested his poisons on living subjects. It was this man who, in the late 1950s supplied Bodhan Stashinsky with the single barrel vapour gun that he used to assassinate Leb Revet in 1957 and the double barreled version of the same weapon with which assassinated Stepan Banderra in 1959.
(This story was used in the making of the James Bond Film, The Man With The Golden Gun. In that film, Bond was brainwashed into attempting to kill his boss using a secret gas gun.)
Stashinsky was later to tell his US saviours that the weapon he used to kill Revet was a single barrel 8 inch long cylinder. He had it rolled into a newspaper he was carrying, he pointed the weapon into Revet's face and 'pop', the man immediately keeled over.
An excerpt from the book 'The Man With The Poison Gun', describes the speed and ease with which the assassination was carried out:
Mairanovsky tested his poisons on living subjects. It was this man who, in the late 1950s supplied Bodhan Stashinsky with the single barrel vapour gun that he used to assassinate Leb Revet in 1957 and the double barreled version of the same weapon with which assassinated Stepan Banderra in 1959.
(This story was used in the making of the James Bond Film, The Man With The Golden Gun. In that film, Bond was brainwashed into attempting to kill his boss using a secret gas gun.)
Stashinsky was later to tell his US saviours that the weapon he used to kill Revet was a single barrel 8 inch long cylinder. He had it rolled into a newspaper he was carrying, he pointed the weapon into Revet's face and 'pop', the man immediately keeled over.
An excerpt from the book 'The Man With The Poison Gun', describes the speed and ease with which the assassination was carried out:
There are two other possible suspects and as information comes to hand it will be published.
You will no doubt note that the Lapstone conference was due to start on Monday 30th November, that's the day that a man was seen on the beach at Somerton. The very next morning the Somerton Man was found dead.
The question of why was the man left on the beach, perhaps its answered by the timing coincidence with the Lapstone conference. A message was being sent.
The question of why was the man left on the beach, perhaps its answered by the timing coincidence with the Lapstone conference. A message was being sent.
Why are no other persons of note mentioned here? I think that Jess's involvement was incidental, I don't think she took part in the planning but I do think she may have seen him a day or before he died
I will be adding more information on each of the suspects over the coming days.
Very interesting post on how to eliminate the opposition by using a rolled up newspaper and a gun, of course. What comes across is the deep mistrust between individual Russians, it very much was a case of who do I trust, each individual must have asked themselves everyday. Stalin's henchmen were everywhere, it must have been horrendous living in such a deadly atmosphere of trust and betrayal. I agree, that Jessie was involved somewhere in this case, perhaps acting as a local go-between pointing out the SM to others? She didn't admit anything to outsiders as she knew the price she would pay. Clive
ReplyDeleteOn the money. That fear is what drove the CPA as well, there was an ongoing battle between Western agencies and the Soviets and it was that that I believe caused Senator Cavanagh to make his remarks in the 70s. He didn't want Australia to continue being a dumping ground for dead spies. In this case, the circumstances match the MO for a classic Soviet assassination, we have an idea who the man was and if that's correct it tells us why he was the target. The information found shows how he died and how it therefore was made to look like a suicide. The Lapstone conference I suspect has some part in the saga, perhaps the assassin came in with that party and he too may have fallen victim to the war. Sounds like a movie plot but this was the height of the Cold War.
ReplyDeleteSomething was going on in Glenelg in the months leading up to this. US Military attache wife heads off to Glenelg before her flight to the USA. Dutch Ambassador daughter stopover in Glenelg before her marriage to MI5's spymaster in Australia. Both these girls were of Dutch descent. 1 definitely worked with NEFIS (Dutch foreign service intelligence service). Did both? Both were married to spies. Both had cover stories for visiting Genelg.
ReplyDeleteDon't forget Mr.King's arrival in the same time frame I think
ReplyDeleteThere is another possibility that fits the obfuscation of identifying SM, besides a hit. And it would involve deliberately keeping SM from ever being identified, at least until someone else died. But, if it is something that still happens, Then keeping SM's identity hidden even now, may indirectly still be protecting others in the same boat. Ill touch on it in the Bigfooty Taman Shud thread and see if the bait is taken.
DeleteApparently it is something that is still current
Deletehttps://www.cnn.com/2018/08/03...et-defector-program/index.htm
Petedavo, that's a good issue to raise, it certainly appears that for whatever reason, his identity had to remain under wraps even now. A big fish.
ReplyDeletepeterdavo, "Daily Telegraph" 7 Dec 1947 Page 47 mentions Tania Teppema, daughter of Netherlands minister-interesting stuff? Clive
ReplyDeleteMr James Montgomery Gilchrist Junior ended up marrying a cousin in the USA. He wrote a pamphlet on his genealogy in 1964. He took an early retirement from the US Dept of State. I believe that the common thing between them was that they both went to Cornell University.
DeleteUnrelated, but interesting, his Nephew was arrested in 1971 for "subversive activities" whilst serving in the US Military.
DeleteDon't know what happened between his announced engagement to Tania Teppema in December 1947 and the December 1948 announcement of her engagement to Robert Victor Hemblys Scales. It would be intriguing to think that this corpse on Somerton Beach might've had something to do with it
DeleteLapstone is some distance from Adelaide, Scherbakov might never have arrived, etc, etc, etc....
ReplyDeleteIt's possible that you're right and all of this had to do with Lapstone, and/or ASIO, and/or the Russians, and/or the Cold War and/or whatever else was politically going on in Australia at the time. It's also possibe that the dead man on a suburban beach in Adelaide wasn't a spy and/or .
I think in this blog (not just this post) you've presented some interesting ideas on who Somerton Man was, and/or how he might have ended up on a quiet stretch of beach in a quiet suburb of the quiet city of Adelaode - but I think all they are is ideas. I think there's very little evidence to conclude that he was Russian....or a spy...or anything else.
OK, let's look at your thinking a little closer.
ReplyDeleteWe are in agreement, the times in Australia as with everywhere else, were exceedingly dangerous. All sides were engaged in a deadly Cold War and there is evidence that suggests all were involved with acts of 'attrition' I would be confident that a good number of victims of this conflict will be found let alone named. Curious indeed that the Lapstone conference occurred at the time it did and itself was the subject of an intensive surveillance operation by the Western powers with little result.The latter fact would probably have given rise to deeper suspicions. In 1948 there was a huge uptick in military 'cooperation' between the UK and Australia, a whole squadron of RN submarines relocated here, the contract for the building of the Vampire Fighter in Sydney and other locations was signed off and significant developments in South Australia related to the building of the A bomb site and the bomb itself. Add to that the 'gathering of the clan' of Western military leaders including intelligence chiefs and you have a lengthy list of activity I don't want to bore you and I am sure that you would be more than capable of doing the necessary research.
It would have to follow that the Soviets would have been intensely interested in the situation and they would have to have had numerous operators in the field.
Against this background, a man is found dead on Somerton Beach in South Australia, he is not identified, he has no identification on his body, labels have been removed from his clothing, a small torn piece from a page of the Rubaiyat is found rolled up tightly and pushed well down in a hard to find waist band fob pocket of the trousers he was wearing and a copy of the book from which the torn piece is said to have come, later turns up with 'pencil marks'/ indentations found on the back page of said book, they appear to be a code of some kind.
In later years John Ruffels read of the meeting between Harry Gold and a certain Russian gentleman at the Earle Theater in the Bronx, in the book he was reading, the Russian was not named but FBI documents revealed him to be Pavel Fedosimov, a Russian consulate official and spy. John stated at the time, that he believed this man closely matched the description of the Somerton Man.
Part 2 to follow
Part 2.
ReplyDeleteI followed up on Fedosimov and over a period of time found that he was mentioned quite often in Venona traffic, I was able to source a photograph from a US website which showed an image of a man named as Fedosimov alongside the Soviet Consul at La Guardia airport in 1947. After extensive searching we found that this is the only photograph of this man that we, (I include Clive Turner in that as he has done a great deal of research on the case), believed to be in existence. Further research was carried out regarding a man of the same name who was a delegate at the UN for many years into the early 1960s, again no photographs have been found. At the time and no doubt since, it was common practice for Soviet diplomats and staff to use pseudonyms and that is highly likely to be the case for Fedosimov, we simply do not know if this was his correct name. We do know that he was meant to have boarded the Pobeda on 31st July 1948 as he had been recalled to Russia. We also know that in Vassiliev's notes, Fedosimov was being recalled because he was believed to be about to defect. There were a number of defections of 'passengers' on the Pobeda including a high profile case of a number of Teachers and family members who simply didn't want to leave. Whilst we have a passenger list for that ship on that date, none of the passengers were certificated by US authorities, there was no confirmation of just who may have boarded. Interestingly Fedopsimov, whose wife had supposedly accompanied him in the US, was not listed and we found no trace of her in subsequent departing passenger lists.
As you see, these are not simply ideas or thought bubbles, the circumstamces of the time, the state of the body, the code page, the torn piece, lack of identity papers, the removal of labels, the unknown cause of death and the failure to identify him, the suspected defector with only the one photograph who apparently is a good match to the mans description.
All of these things add up to my belief that this man was involved in espionage, it is, in my view highly likely that he is Russian or at least from the Eastern bloc and that he was assassinated.
You have your opinion and I respect that.
I've read enough about Semen Ivanovich Makarov now to know he was a lazy slob and an absolute animal! How he only got a demotion when he got back to Moscow must tell yiu that as an agent of the NKVD he must've been owed a favour.
ReplyDeleteUpdated with image of Sergei Sherbakov, 6th February 2020
ReplyDelete