Friday 28 August 2020

SOMERTON MAN: WAS THE BOOK A SIGNAL IN ITSELF?


FIRST PUBLISHED ON 10th JULY 2018

EXTRACTED FROM MI5 FILES

See Update at the foot of this article...

In this post, I will be looking at the likelihood of the book drop being a form of signal. 

In research, I stumbled across a really interesting piece of information concerning the methods used by Soviet agents to arrange meetings and information exchanges. In this case, it was an MI5 interview with Klaus Fuchs.

By the way, the street view images below are navigable.



Apologies for the somewhat blurry image but this is an extract from MI5 files and they include an account given by MI5 agent Jim Skardon, he spoke of showing a map of the Kew area in East London to Klaus Fuchs, the Atom Spy.


The Signal

Fuchs said that he had been given instructions to throw a copy of a magazine, 'Men Only' over a fence/hedge of a house that stood in its own grounds on the corner of Kew Road and Stanmore road between the third and fourth trees located along the gardens of the house in Stanmore road. On the tenth page, he was to indicate the arrangements that would be used should a planned rendezvous not occur.

Kew Road/Stanmore Road



If you navigate further into Stanmore Road you will find that like the Pier Street Glenelg address, there is an alleyway/close about 70-80 metres in on the left. The building behind the target house looks to be post-war and it may be that an alleyway ran across the back of the target house in the late 40s early 50s.

Holmesdale Road, Eastern End

Having thrown the magazine over the fence he was the to go to the eastern end and North side of Holmesdale Road, about 1 klm away from the Stanmore Road drop, and there he was to place a chalk mark on the fence of that house at the end of the street and the mark should be placed on the fence opposite a tree he would find there. This would indicate to the occupant of the Stanmore Road house that there was something in his garden to be collected.




As you can see there is still an old tree outside that corner house but the fence seems to have long gone and has been replaced by a wall.

Here's the overview map of both locations, again it's a navigable map:


It looks almost like a route for taking the dog for a walk?

More

Skardon investigated the locations and researched the names of the occupants of the house in Kew Road, but the files did not disclose the result of his inquiries.

In another memo, also marked Top Secret and dated the following month, Skardon wrote: “He gave me some details of the recognition signals for his various new contacts.

“He … told me that the arrangements for the rendezvous upon returning to England in 1946 … were that his contact would carry a bundle of books tied with a cord and that he should himself carry a copy of ‘Life’.”

Fuchs also named his “introducers” as Jurgen Kuczynski, a professor at Berlin University, and Hannah Klopstech, who lived in Hampstead, north London.

“The arrangement made by Hannah Klopstech was that he should go to the public house at Wood Green (the Nags Head) carrying a copy of ‘Tribune’, and that he should sit at a bench with a table in front of it in the saloon bar.

“His contact would carry a red book in his hands.”

Hampstead cropped up some time ago in relation to the work done on Tibor Kaldor. Must revisit that!


UPDATE

Note how books and magazines were used as signals by Fuchs. In the first case he threw a magazine over a fence and then went to a tree some distance away and chalk marked it so that his contact would know there was a message waiting for him. Fuchs was to write on the tenth page of the magazine giving details of alternative arrangements should a planned rendezvous not go ahead.

Later Fuchs describes another occasion when once again books were used as signals in the identification process. In this case he would carry a copy of LIFE magazine and his contact would be carrying a bundle of books tied with a cord.

A third example was when he was to go to the Nags Head in Wood Green and he was to carry a copy of the 'TRIBUNE' a newspaper, his contact would have a red book in his hands.

So there it is, a possible explanation for the purpose of the book thrown into the car in Glenelg. Food for thought. Worthy of note is the fact that the interview took place in the early 50s and at that time, the signal method used was apparently new to MI5. 

Is it possible that the Rubaiyat that was found contained other information? Despite best efforts, the image that we have is not of particularly good quality, and we only see two pages of it To this stage we have some markings that show up but not very clear.

The Fuchs incidents took place around 1946, which would mean that the same technique could have been in use in Australia in 1948, but MI5 or other agencies may not have considered the possibility. But then again, who knows?

Share:

13 comments:

  1. Fedosimov was born December ll, 1910, in Kirov, Russia. From 1939
    to l9AO,}e was employed by Amtorg Trading Corporation, New York City. From
    1940 to 19in, he was employed in the People's Commissariat for Foreign Affairs
    in Russia. On April 4, 1944, he re-entered the United States and assumed
    duties at the USSR Consulate, New York City. He occupied a commandingposition
    in the activities of the Consulate and had the various titles of First Secretary
    and Vice Consul. He departed from the United States aboard the S. S. Pobeda on
    July 31, 1948. 00 9h5229-2, 9!
    By letter dated January 30, 1951, the Washington Field Office
    advised that lookout notices had been placed with the Immigration and
    Naturalization Service, and that stop notices had been placed with the Bureau
    of Customs, in order that the Bureau might be advised of any re entry of
    Fedosimovinto the United States.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, that's all known and agreed to, we can add other references through until 1959 where a person of that name represented the Soviet Union on various committees for the IAEA. However, and this very important, there are no photographs that we can find of the man named Fedosimov who appeared in a photo alongside Nikolai Novikov: https://tamamshud.blogspot.com/2017/05/somerton-man-pavel-fedosimov-hi-res.html

    The date of this image was April 1947, no photos after that time. the man named as Fedosimov in that picture left the US on the Pobeda in 1948 and has not been seen since.

    We should also be mindful that it was practice for Soviet Diplomats to use cover names, both Yatskov and Feklisov stationed in NY at the same time as Fedosimov used cover names as did other NKVD agents.

    https://tamamshud.blogspot.com/2018/10/somerton-man-soviet-cold-war-cover.html

    If you have any knowledge or additional information, especially a photograph of Fedosimov that you can prove was taken after December 1st 1948 that would be welcomed and appreciated.

    Thank you for taking the time to post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Maybe they can not find photos because Fedosimov is not a real name?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that's a strong possibility. Thanks again.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Pavel = Paul in English
    Fedossimov = Fedosimov in English
    Same as the name used by someone to enter the USA o 1/1/1939 on the Queen Mary
    https://www.geni.com/people/Paul-Fedosimov/6000000148980251830

    ReplyDelete
  6. That's correct Pete, We have him tracked on the Queen Mary but couldn't find his wife, Vera Fedosimova on the passenger list.

    Strange really given that later in 1944 I think, he was interviewed over a possible offence of Bigamy. That fact may be an indication of someone using other names, what do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  7. He wasn't married.
    The confusion about him having a wife was caused by the Venona analysts incorrectly guessing that MAJ was Fedosimov when MAJ was in fact someone else all along. By the time the NSA realised their mistake and realised Fedosimov was STEPHAN they'd already attributed someone else's wife to him. Ignore Vera. I've deleted reference to her on his profile.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Here is the proof that MAJ (May) was not Fedosimov.
    https://fayllar.org/index-and-concordance-to-alexander-vassilievs-notebooks-and-so.html?page=5

    ReplyDelete
  9. When he arrived at New York in 1939 they is no record of a wife in the passenger manifest
    https://www.geni.com/photo/view?album_type=photos_of_me&id=6000000148980251830&photo_id=6000000149004868918&position=0

    ReplyDelete
  10. Here's a link to the page that provides information on Pavel's travel movements:

    https://tamamshud.blogspot.com/2019/08/somerton-man-pavel-fedosimov-travel.html

    You'll see that he first arrives in 1939 as 'PAUL FEDOSIMOV', as you point out. Interestingly we do not have any information for an outbound journey in 1939 or 1940 but, he is shown inbound again as 'PEVEL FEDOSIMOV' but with his wife Vera Fedosimova in 1940. (Vassiliev's notes have him down as STEPAN and note that he was previously incorrectly identified as MAJ.) Pavel is recalled to Russia for war service in 1942, no travel record for that trip. He returns in April 1944 again with Vera Fedosimova. He is named on the passenger manifest for the POBEDA departing on 31st August 1948 but his record of departure and the records of others were not certificated. Vera Fedosimova as not on the manifest.

    The records are all corroborated by Vassiliev's notes. I would certainly agree that there is something bery odd about his travel records. There would have been opportunity to slip another person in to the US. Having a couple of Fdosimov's present would no doubt be useful.

    Bear in mind that we have only the one photograph of the man and we only know his name courtesy of TASS and SOVFOTO, in other words, the man in the picture may or may not be named Fedosimov.

    ReplyDelete
  11. PeteDavo - he definitely had a wife Vera Sergneyva. She appears occasional on various CIA FOI documents both predating and post dating SM. The auto-text scanning might occasionally have her as Vora not Vera - but she is mentioned in documents about Fedosimov's time as the Resident in NY, and later in connection with the post-1950 Fedosimov - who is traceable to postings in Britain and Libya before regularly appearing at some Nuclear conferences through the 1950s and if memory serves me right into the 60's

    We also need ot be a bit careful about English versions. While it's possible that Pavel becomes Pawel, Pawl or even Paul I'd imagine travel records back then are based on travel documents like passports - rather than on the name a passenger chooses to use. That said, other countries in other eras mMIGHT have done things vastly different.

    One of the things I find quite interesting is that Fedosimov is a relatively common surname (although not as common as Fedorov/Fedoroff) and Pavel Ivanovich seems to be a common given-name combination - but the two together seem rarer.

    I'm sort of interested how the names derive (if there's some Russian speaker who can enlighten/correct this because I'm almost certain there's a lot here I misunderstand): My understanding is that Russian names are often Patronymic and that 'Ov', 'Sim' and 'ich' are different ways of saying something like 'son of'/'child of' (I think 'ov' is Masculine, and the feminine equivalents would be 'ova' or 'evna'
    This makes for an interesting name, because it seems to have derived as Pavel son of Ivan Son of Son of Fedor (Fedorov and Fedosov seem to be common names) - and IF my understanding about how this should give a traceable lineage as long as we can understand the subtle differences to the suffixes.
    Not sure whether Ivaonvich = Son of Ivan or Son of Ivanonv - ie Son Of, Son of Ivan

    ReplyDelete
  12. Seeing that these comments are mostly about Pavel Fedosimov, and this post is about the book and the similarity of techniques compared to the Klaus Fuchs case, I will move them across later today to the latest discussion on and around Pavel Fedosimov.

    ReplyDelete
  13. How about we try to untangle this.

    1.I think we are agreed that a Paul Fedossimov, note the surname has a double S, arrived on the Queen Mary in 1939. Yes?

    2. He was unaccompanied on that journey, his wife was not with him. Yes?

    3. He returned sometime in 1942 to Russia for war service. Yes?

    4. A person by the name of PEVEL FEDOSIMOV arrived in the US in 1940

    5. He was accompanied by a Vera Fedosimova on that trip.

    6. At some time in 1942 Pavel Fedosimov returned to Russia for War service. Yes?

    7. He returned to the US in April 1944. Yes?

    8. He was accompanied by a Vera Fedosimova, his wife at that time. Yes?

    9. On 31 st August 1948, Pavel Fedosimov's name crops up on the passenger manifest for the Pobeda bound for Odesa. Yes?

    10. Vera Fedosimova's name does not appear on the Pobeda passenger manifest. Yes?

    Before we get into the rest of the issues raised, can we get the above 10 points either agreed to or alternative answers put forward. If we stick to a process we will get through it.

    Over to you..

    ReplyDelete

Hi
Welcome to the Tamam Shud Blog, widely regarded as the most trusted fact and evidence-based blog on the Somerton Man case.
Visit our YouTube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOamLze8PyNDafjjBGGngJQ

ABOUT US and OUR RECORD

Learn more about, when the blog started our location plus a long list of 'finds' and new evidence discovered by this blog