Sunday 7 February 2021

SOMERTON MAN: HOW THE CODE PAGE WAS WRITTEN, STEP BY STEP IMAGES


ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED:
OCTOBER 2nd 2017





For some years now I haven't deviated from the position that the Somerton Man code page was initially written using the SOE's INK H technique. I can honestly say that I have examined and re-examined the images many times but each time with the same results.

Found in an SOE Manual from WW2, the Ink H technique was amongst other methods used by intelligence services of all persuasions to conceal clandestine communications.

The method is simple and I have previously posted step by step images of the process. Essentially, larger letters are written out in ink, probably a blue/black colour. These letters could be stand-alone block capitals or cursive writing as in a poem or a standard letter. Think 'code page' and Jestyn's Verse 70 and there are now thought to be other examples.

The next step is to use a sharpened hard pencil, a 5H or 6H in today's standards, and insert micro letters and/or numbers into the shape of the already written letters.

Next, the inked letters with their microcode are written over again in the same blue/black ink. To the naked eye, the pencilled microcode would be hard to see and thus would be missed.

The recipient of the letters or poem etc, knowing the true nature of the communication would immerse the paper containing the writing into a strong bleach solution. This would develop' the hidden code by removing the ink but leaving the pencilled micro-message.

Immediately you will have noticed one small problem and that is once the code has been developed there is nothing to show as the bleach continues to act after the message has been removed, the full message disappears unless of course, you were to take a photograph of each stage of the process.

But, moving on...

INDENTATIONS

Having said that the message eventually disappears, there is something else left behind and that is the indentations left on the paper that was used as a rest for the original set of letters or words.

This post is all about how the microcode was written and how the indentations were left. A separate post will cover off the recovery method.

Indentations were a perennial problem for field agents, it was something they were always aware of and were, in fact, taught ways in which to remove them from pages beneath the one on which secret ink messages had been written. One method is to use a flat iron on the offending pages and another was to use steam. 

In the case of the Somerton Man, however, the indentations remained and that fact was pointed out to me by ex-Detective Sergeant Gerry Feltus, author of the Unkown Man book, Gerry also told me that part of the process was to turn the initial image of the indentations on the code page negative.

THE PAPER TYPE

In a recent post regarding the Tibor Kaldor letter, Clive mentioned the nature of the paper that TK ad used, it was almost transparent as used to be the standard for airmail letters because of the lightweight yet tough nature of the paper which was referred to as 'Onion Skin' paper. 

Interestingly Yatskov/Yakovlev handed Harry Gold a sheet of onion skin paper containing a list of instructions during their meeting  ( See 'DARK SUN' The making of the Hydrogen Bomb.)

The following images show clearly step by step, just how the INK H method was used on the Somerton Man Code Page and more to the point for this blog post, how the indentations were left behind by the person who wrote them and then how they were discovered

Step 1. The Materials. Lightweight paper, 50gsm. Semi-translucent, white stock paper 120 gsm, 5H Pencil, Charcoal pencil, Fountain pen with blue/black ink. 

Step 2. Insert the white stock paper beneath the translucent paper

Step 3. Using a 5H pencil, the word SECRET is written on the upper, translucent paper and photograph:



Step 4. Remove the translucent paper and rub over the surface of the white paper where it was seated beneath the translucent paper using, in this case, a charcoal pencil:



Step 5. The indentations show up perfectly in white, a photograph is taken. These nor anything like these markings exists on the Somerton Man code page.

Step 6. The photograph is turned negative and the word SECRET now turns to black and quite bold:



Step 7. Next, write in the Letter 'E' in ink on the translucent paper and Insert microcode letters/numbers into the inked space of the letter using a 5H pencil and photograph:




Step 8. Once again, remove the top translucent paper and then rub over the location beneath to reveal the indentations left by the microcode and photograph:



Step 9. Next, the photograph of the 'rubbed' letter 'E' containing microcode is turned negative, the white coloured microcode is turned black and the pencil rubbed area is turned white:


It was these markings that the Police or whichever agency wrote over.

In the next post, we'll look at the method used to recover the microcode from the code page.

Republished to assist Milongal, FYI, the only glass plate involved was the original photograph which it is believed was taken with a glass plate camera.

Milongal also had a question, he was wondering how come we have to use all this equipment and techniques to recover the microcode?


The answer put simply, they had the original paper, we don't

Share:

2 comments:

  1. This method of writing code might explain the 3 "H" pencils, the knife (to sharpen them) and the brush, to apply charcoal or similar to reveal code that were in SM's suitcase. An unrelated point - Fed has a mole on the right of his face (facing him) and SM does not so Fed not SM. Tim

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the comments. Personally, I don't think that the suitcase belonged to the Somerton Man but that for another time.

    Regarding the 'mole' on the SMs face. I have discussed that a few times over the years and the most informative discussion was the Gerry Feltus. In his view, the 'mole' was likely to have been caused by blood splatter during the post mortem. I agree with that view having also witnessed the procedure a number of times.

    You could also consider a nick whilst shaving or just a skin blemish such as a pimple. My point being that there are other possibilities concerning the'mole' and whilst that's the case, it's not wise to remove a candidate based on a single opinion that has no proof. If the proof is forthcoming that's a different matter of course.

    In the case of Fedosimov, we know that the last photograph of him was in 1947, whilst someone with that name has cropped up a quite a few occasions, there are not photographs to this date that have been recovered. We also know that, according to Vassiliev's notes that Fedosimov was under suspicion of being about to betray the 'Mother Country' which was one of the reasons for his recall. In those times such an event on a Soviet's record normally meant a swift end. Again, whilst at this time we have no photograph after 1947 of the person called Fedosimov and therefore unable to compare them, that could change. In which case I would graciously change my position.

    ReplyDelete

Hi
Welcome to the Tamam Shud Blog, widely regarded as the most trusted fact and evidence-based blog on the Somerton Man case.
Visit our YouTube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOamLze8PyNDafjjBGGngJQ

ABOUT US and OUR RECORD

Learn more about, when the blog started our location plus a long list of 'finds' and new evidence discovered by this blog