SOMERTON MAN MYSTERY

The Evidence The Facts In Detail In Depth

THE TAMAMSHUD MYSTERY, SOMERTON MAN; THE CONVERGENCE, THE PIECES FALL INTO PLACE, IT'S ALL ABOUT THE CODE, IT WAS ALWAYS ABOUT THE CODE & A NEW BREAKTHROUGH...


....CONVERGENCE....


.....The diagram above sums it up. Thanks to the recent input of our new group member '73' and the ongoing input and advice from the other members of our group through this journey, we can now clearly visualize the core of the Somerton Man case. And whilst the identity of the Man certainly has relevance, it is only a part of the puzzle. We are awaiting the results from the coroner's investigation but it would be true to say that we may never know this man's identity. My view is and has been for some time, that he is not Carl Webb.

We will however know the circumstances leading up to hu death. We will know the details of the messages contained on the code page and just what it was that the man had written in the Nihilist Cipher on the torn slip, TAMAM SHUD.

The recent information that proves the existence of a listening station and intercepts being passed on to Naval Intelligence in Melbourne has been extraordinarily useful. Whilst the volunteers will have passed on many such intercepts, they would not know what those messages were and who may have sent them. I am sure that they would also not be in a position to speak of such messages and that is to be expected and respected.

In the background to the diagram, there are numerous agencies, as yet not positively identified, who may be involved they would include, MI5, MI6, CIA, Australian Military Intelligence, Mossad, Czech Intelligence, the various 'special branch' wings of the State police, the subversive squads and more

THE NEW BREAKTHROUGH

At this point, I would like to make everyone aware that having spent a lot of time on the Tamam Shud slip and learning about how ciphers can be double-encoded,, I have been able to show and prove that the microcode on the code page is a NIHILIST cipher as used by the Soviets in the 1940s through until the 1950s. Both the torn slip and the code page used the same cipher.

Here's a screen grab of the Cipher Identifier showing the groups and the result, a 100 % finding of the NIHILIST Cipher:



Here's the full TAMAM SHUD phrase extracted ciphertext:


And here is the 'Cipher Breaker' out put:

I have highlighted part of the break, it shows the word 'MENTIES'. The issue here might be that if I had wrongly transcribed or if the Somerton Man had wrongly transcribed one of the cipher text letters, that word could be MENZIES.

THE ANALYSIS, AN UPDATE

The latest news on the analysis work is that having identified the code page was also written in the Nihilist Cipher, there are some direct comparisons, one of which is the fact that the first group of cipher text found in the torn slip had 6 characters, all numbers and the first group of the microcode found in the first letter M, also has 6 characters and again all numbers. This is important because thanks to the information written up by Alexander FOOTE, ( A member of the Soviet Spy Group, ROTE DRIE) we know that the Soviets specified that the first key in their messages should contain 6 letters and further that they should be from the top 8 most frequently used letters of the English alphabet.

The focus is on breaking the first key cipher. When we have that we will know the intended recipient of the message by title but not by name. We will also be able to see the numbers associated with the keyword/second key needed to crack open the entire cipher text. Those numbers are very likely a book code, they will comprise a page number, (2 digits), a line number (2 digits), and finally a word number,(single digit)a book code. The question will be which book? Will it be as simple as the Rubaiyat?

That is the theory, but there is a possibility that there could be another level of complexity in the cipher text as in the breaking up of the messages with the use of both letters and numbers.

The next step is to break the second key cipher. Again, thanks to Alexander Foote, we know how the second key was constructed and where it might be found.

THE BOXALL RUBAIYAT

Once the torn slip and code page have, hopefully, been decrypted, attention will be turned to the Boxall Rubaiyat to uncover the nature of the microcode written by both Alf Boxall and Jestyn. It does necessarily follow that, even if the code is shown to be Nihilist, that Alf and Jestyn were Soviets, there are reasons to believe that Jestyn may well have been a 'sparrow', someone planted in the CPA to obtain and pass on information to Military intelligence, Alf Boxall.

SUMMATION

Obviously, the work has yet to be completed, the decrypt is on its way, and just what that contains we do not know. Will it mention names? Will it mention secrets?  Will it find yet another layer of code?

I am aware that there are a few groups overseas looking at the cipher text as I write this post. It could be that they will be the first to crack the messages and that's OK, the main thing is that they get it cracked and I would be more than happy to thank them for their work.


24 Comments

Hi
Welcome to the Tamam Shud Blog, widely regarded as the leading and most trusted fact and evidence-based blog on the Somerton Man case. Please take a moment to review our comment guidelines here:

https://tamamshud.blogspot.com/p/tamam-shud-blog-rules.html

Visit our YouTube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOamLze8PyNDafjjBGGngJQ

  1. You keep saying he is not Carl Webb
    But you offer nothing as to who he is
    So at the moment it is said he is Carl Webb

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not sure where you learned your English language but because I say clearly and go on to substantiate the reasons why I say that the Somerton Man is not Carl Webb simply does not mean that I know who the Somerton Man is. It means that I do not see any verifiable proof that Carl Webb is the Somerton Man, in fact I see the opposite, there is no verifiable proof that he is. I don't have to offer an alternative and certainly wouldn't do that without any proof. I suggest you consider carefully the words that you put together before you post them otherwise you end up looking silly as you do in this instance.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    3. The only person who will decide the identity of the exhumed remains is the Coroner and then he may be able to determine whether or not those remains are those of the Somerton Man. This is not a forum for you to spout your unproven theories, you should get your own blog.

      Delete
  2. Would it be fair to say that the Somerton Man was collateral damage?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suppose you could say that but I would balance that against what appears to be his deliberate copying of an encoded message that may have been about to be sent or, it could have been just received. It depends on what you mean by collateral to some extent. I would think he knew the risks he was taking so his capture or demise would have been obvious to him, but maybe not. He may have thought he had someone to watch over him? A good question.

      Delete
  3. Watching with greater interest Gordon. There is a strength in this post that I haven't seen for sometime. Good to meet you Gerroff. A name like that suggests that you are Mancunian perhaps?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gordon, would you think it likely that Naval Intelligence may have found having the actual RoK and not a ‘similar’ copy more than useful in their attempts to decipher the code?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. I would think exactly that. My view is that the ROK would have been filled with markings of all kinds including underlined words here and there especially if it was the book used to create the page number, line number and word number. I can show some in the next post that appear on the code page, (from a previous post on that subject), and on the torn slip. All about the code, 'bout the code, no problems!

      Delete
  5. Thanks for that, my next question might be a little harder to answer… why do you think didn’t SAPOL send it to them? I’m certain Naval Intelligence was more than capable of securing the evidence while it was in their possession.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really don't have the answer to that, it would be pure guesswork. Once the code in the torn slip has been cracked then it may be possible to give you an answer. Sorry.

      Delete
  6. Gordon, let me put it another way .. in your experience with codes and code-breakers, have you ever known of another instance where the possible source of the code has been denied access to the men and women tasked with deciphering it?

    ReplyDelete
  7. There is nothing more that I can share with you on this subject. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Gordon, something that confuses me. If the man in the beach was different to the man in the morgue/plaster bust man, that means Jestyn reacted to someone who was not the SM. Isn’t the link to the ROK/Jestyn from the slip in SM’s pocket? So why does she react to the man in the morgue as if she knew him?

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  10. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The three previous comments have been deleted and moved to the more appropriate post on the plaster bust, here:
    https://tamamshud.blogspot.com/2023/12/casting-enigma-exploration-of-methods.html?sc=1705882286772#c4962088104555882502

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hey! Mr.Cramer there’s word around that cipher mysteries found something about Dorothy Webb’s school days did you know about this?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Fair comment, but I really wasn't out to be sarcastic to you, my mistake! You should see some of the comments that I simply won't publish. Some very sick people out there sadly.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Talking on the code, any news on cracking that nihilist one?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Read the Alexander Foote book with the code breakdown and it has just dawned on me that they used an ‘authenticator’ similar to the DANETTA code word. Clever people.

    ReplyDelete
  16. That's correct, it's a very similar authentication method to the DANETTA code but it goes further and ends up being fully integrated into the end cipher text by virtue of the individual numbers associated with each letter of the code word and its position within the Polybius matrix

    In addition, there are two more 'authenticators' within the Nihilist Cipher used by ROTE DREI. one being the group of numbers that indicate a page number, a line number and a word within a line number. That word, let's say its the 4 th word on the line, being the first of a phrase which may contains 15 or more words it could even be a full quatrain from the Rubaiyat. That phrase is then encoded and the resultant groups of numbers are added to the original code group numbers. Complex isn't it :) This is precisely the challenge I am working through right now in attempting to decipher the code found in the torn slip.

    A lot has been said about the 'missing' copy of the rubaiyat, one of the reasons it is missing is because there will be markings on various pages of that book. Not only that, somewhere there is a second copy of that same edition, which could be in Australia but more likely it is in Moscow that is if it still exists. I believe that the first book containing the code page indentations still exists and it may even turn up one day.

    ReplyDelete
  17. An update. Working alongside an overseas cryptanalyst company, the finding is that the cipher found in the torn slip is at heart a Nihilist cipher but with layers of modification. These modifications appear to match the cipher used by the Rote Drie/ 'Lucy' Soviet espionage network. A name found within the cipher text is most probably ‘Menzies’. This and other information has been forwarded to SAPOL for inclusion in their report to the coroner.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post
/body>