...CODE NAME: WALLFLOWER
THE GUY LIDDELL DIARIES...
Between late August 1939 and mid-May 1953, Guy Liddell wrote his diaries, which covered WW2 and what is referred to as the 'Early Cold War' years. In all an astonishing 22 volumes tell of the activities of British MI5.
An ex-Royal Artillery officer Guy Liddell made a humble start in intelligence in 1919 via the London, Metropolitan Police, Special Branch as a counter-intelligence officer. Through the 1920s and 30s, he became very familiar with networks of German and Soviet spy networks in the UK.
'During the 1930s British intelligence produced increasing evidence of Russian and German spying in the British Isles. For Liddell, this came as no surprise. When British codebreakers broke Russian ciphers revealing Moscow-inspired espionage in Great Britain in the 1920s, Liddell was part of a team that raided the offices of ARCOS, the Soviet trading office in London, then at the heart of Bolshevik spying.' ......Dr. Ray Batvinis, historian.
MI5 In Australia
Part 1.
I will add to this post in the coming days.
Update 1. Full List of Liddell Diaries with links:
- VOL 1A__KV-4-185__28 AUG 39 – 26 NOV 39
- VOL 1B__KV-4-185__27 NOV 39 – 29 FEB 40
- VOL 2A__KV-4-186__1 MAR 40 – 7 AUG 40
- VOL 2B__KV-4-186__9 AUG 40 – 2 OCT 40
- VOL 3A__KV-4-187__3 OCT 40 – 3 APR 41
- VOL 3B__KV-4-187__4 APR 41 – 31 MAY 41
- VOL 4A__KV-4-188__2 JUN 41 – 25 OCT 41
- VOL 4B__KV-4-188__27 OCT 41 – 29 NOV 41
- VOL 5A__KV-4-189__1 DEC 41 – 12 MAR 42
- VOL 5B__KV-4-189__13 MAR 42 – 25 MAY 42
- VOL 6A__KV-4-190__26 MAY 42 – 22 SEP 42
- VOL 6B__KV-4-190__23 SEP 42 – 30 NOV 42
- VOL 7A__KV-4-191__3 APR 43 – 30 JUN 43
- VOL 7B__KV-4-191__1 DEC 42 – 2 APR 43
- VOL 8A__KV-4-192__1 JUL 43 – 30 AUG 43
- VOL 8B__KV-4-192__31 AUG 43 – 5 NOV 43
- VOL 8C__KV-4-192__6 NOV 43 – 30 NOV 43
- VOL 9A__KV-4-193__1 DEC 43 – 11 FEB 44
- VOL 9B__KV-4-193__12 FEB 44 – 29 APR 44
- VOL 10A__KV-4-194__1 MAY 44 – 18 JUN 44
- VOL 10B__KV-4-194__19 JUN 44 – 31 AUG 44
- VOL 11A__KV-4-195__1 SEP 44 – 13 OCT 44
- VOL 11B__KV-4-195__14 OCT 44 – 15 DEC 44
- VOL 11C__KV-4-195__16 DEC 44 – 31 DEC 44
- VOL 12A__KV-4-196__1 JAN 45 – 7 MAR 45
- VOL 12B__KV-4-196__19 MAR 45 – 29 MAY 45
- VOL 12C__KV-4-196__30 MAY 45 – 1 JUN 45
- VOL 13__KV-4-466__18 JUN 45 – 17 NOV 45
- VOL 14__KV-4-467__19 NOV 45 – 25 SEP 46
- VOL 15__KV-4-468__26 SEP 46 – 3 MAR 47
- VOL 16__KV-4-469__13 MAY 47 – 31 DEC 47
- VOL 17__KV-4-470__1948
- VOL 18__KV-4-471__1949
- VOL 19__KV-4-472__1950
- VOL 20__KV-4-473__1951
- VOL 21__KV-4-474__1952
- VOL 22__KV-4-475__1 JAN 53 – 15 MAY 53
In the 1948 diary marked part 1 and on page 31, there is a reference a SIGINT man named POLDEN. This man had knowledge of the security breach and had mentioned it to an Aus Government official ahead of the Hollis visit. It is believed that this man had a direct connection to MI5. A check of NAA files show 28 people of that name. Two of them look interesting and will be followed up, both were from South Australia.
ReplyDeleteKeep in mind that post WWII those who served were cobbers
ReplyDeleteand they had fought for our democratic system
Anyone who presented a threat
to that system after they war,
in other words communism
would be up against the boys.
RSL was strong post war years, clubs, meetings.
Dwyer was AMF Lieutenant Colonel, one of the boys
The dental chart has no reference mark
and that may be for a reason or just a mix up
Even if it did match the body in the grave it's not positive proof
that the person in the grave was on Somerton beach.
You need more than that.
On your last point, we have to disagree. What your saying is akin to saying that all of the statements made in courts by anybody ever are not valid evidence. I am sure you would agree that it would be ridiculous.
DeleteHere's the thing, the dental chart taken by Dr Dwyer from the body identified to him as being that which was recovered from Somerton Beach and submitted in evidence to the coroner is as close as you can get to being at the autopsy watching the chart being written. The same applies to all of the links of the chain that started at Somerton Beach and ended on that mortuary slab under the scalpel and other instruments of Dr Dwyer.
You mentioned that more than the chart would be needed, exactly what more did you expect? And to properly qualify your response, could you inform us all just what your credentials are as they would pertain to these issues?
Thanks for your comment. The RSL in those days had a different name from 1940 to 1965:
ReplyDeleteReturned Sailors', Soldiers' and Airmen's Imperial League of Australia (RSSAILA),
There was a movement known as The Association which you may care to read about, there are a few posts on this blog. They had a very close relationship with the RSSAILA and for the reasons that you allude to. In fact there was an interesting meeting at the Glenelg branch during November I believe, there's an article about it on Trove and pretty sure I posted it here.
Regarding the dental chart it is quite specific evidence based on its inclusion as an exhibit in the inquest, however given Paul Lawson's comments regarding the skull of the body he worked on, that could be an issue as to whether the skull had been replaced but whose was the body? Lawson had also said that the body was smaller than he expected, an interesting comment I think you'll agree.
If the teeth do not match then he is not the Somerton Man. If the teeth do match then the DNA from the teeth AND the skull need to be matched against DNA from other parts of the body, thigh bone I understand is a good location.
At the moment there is considerable doubt as I see it, that the DNA results provided by Professor Abbott are valid and for reasons put forward on this blog.
As Doctor Xanthe Mallet said early on in the piece, we may never know the real identity of the Somerton Man and that question is the only that has been referred to the Coroner at this stage.
Thanks again for your comment.
It may have escaped your notice that this is a 1948 cold case and the witnesses are now long gone. We have the evidence and statements that was accepted at the time and that is what we work with, whatever that leads us to. The dental chart was submitted and accepted by the coroner as was Doctor Dwyers evidence and that is ample proof that it is a genuine article.
ReplyDeletePlease don't submit any further comments here until you have researched the case thoroughly and gained an understanding of what is and what is not possible.
I think that somewhere in these documents is the original 'licence to kill' issued to British agents and they could do it anywhere.
ReplyDelete