THIS PHOTOGRAPH
DOES NOT LIE...
UNMARKED PHOTOGRAPH
....Here's the unmarked-up version of the image above:
....THE EVIDENCE....
....The image comparison above clearly shows that whilst the left ear of Charlie and Young Carl are identical, the left ear of the Somerton Man is totally different in its outer shape and the inner part of the ear...
I may not be using the correct term for the indention point but you can see that in the case of Charlie and Carl their 'points' are in the same location towards the upper ear, that of the Somerton Man as seen in the post-autopsy image is low down near the lobe.
You can also see that the Somerton Man's left ear is squarely joined to the face whilst both Charlie and Carl have distinctive curves to the outer ear.
As you read through this evidential material you will quickly arrive at the conclusion that there must have been 2 bodies.
In the image above you can compare and clearly see that the Pre Bust Photograph which does not match that of the Somerton Man, matches the same joined curved ear of Charlie and of the young Carl.
Whilst Charlie Webb may be the man shown in the image on the left and on whom Paul Lawson based his creation of the plaster bust, he is clearly not the Somerton Man as shown in the image on the right.
There is a significant difference between
the appearance of the faces in the Post-Autopsy and Pre-Bust photographs to be resolved AND the matter of Paul Lawson's comments regarding the removal of the skull from the body on which he worked.
The conclusion is that there were two bodies. The Somerton Man as per the post-autopsy photographs and the man Charlie Webb as in the Pre-Bust photograph.
PAUL LAWSON'S DIARY NOTES
AND FROM ANOTHER POST HERE
The conclusion is that there were two bodies. The Somerton Man as per the post-autopsy photographs and the man Charlie Webb as in the Pre-Bust photograph.
PAUL LAWSON'S DIARY NOTES
(First Posted in 2014)
Read the top section in particular:
Police Job
Interview with Detectives (Brown + 1)
Police Job
Interview with Detectives (Brown + 1)
Ring from Constable Durham (Updated 19th October 2020, the name should be Constable DINHAM re DISPOSAL of ORIGINAL Body, (there was a Constable J.O. DINHAM in SAPOL at the time.)
Casting of ears and piecing together mold.
AND FROM ANOTHER POST HERE
DATING BACK TO NOVEMBER 27th 2022:
All of the images of Charlie, Young Carl, Somerton Man post autopsy, and pre bust that I have used here are shown in the previous post which you will find here..
Tags
Carl Webb
Charles Webb Not the Somerton Man
Constable DInham
Paul Lawson Diary
photographic evidence
Somerton Man
That pre bust photo has a curves ear lobe like Charley and Carl. Two bodies?
ReplyDeleteThat's on the money, first posted about this issue in 2014 and a number of times since. First past the post again :)
DeleteA quick note, separately in recent times, I have been assisting Pete Bowes in his work of establishing the height of Charlie Webb and have sent him some images that support his view.
ReplyDeleteWell well! Seems like you were right all along and the good professor may have brought about his own Eschaton
ReplyDeleteIt seems that what Professor Abbott has unwittingly done is to prove that Charlie Webb IS NOT THE SOMERTON MAN.
ReplyDeleteHe has also been instrumental in proving that THERE WAS A SECOND BODY. This second point is something that I have been saying since 2014.
To all those who have spent many hours researching the Webb family. It wasn't a wasted effort because in the end in a way you have inadvertently contributed to and supported the succesful claims made here.
Interestingly, it also means that the question of just who the Somerton Man is, is once again open.
My reading of the current situation is that there was a 'Joker' in the pack. The Joker being the man in the pre bust photograph. Now it seems abundantly clear that the man in the pre bust photograph was not the Somerton Man, and it was the hair samples from this person that Colleen Fitzpatrick extracted the DNA and together with Professor Abbott, they jointly, and incorrectly, announced that they had found the name of the Somerton Man being Carl Webb, when they had in fact found the name of the man who was used to create the bust and not the somerton man.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if this was why Doctor Xianthe Mallet the forensic scientist made the comment about the identity of the Somerton Man might never be known?
Succinctly put. I am surprised that two extremely intelligent people didn't address the considerable differences between the post-autopsy and pre-bust photographs. Blinded by what they thought was their imminent success?
ReplyDelete