MICRO WRITING/CODE DEMONSTRATION VIDEO
(SEE UPDATE AT BASE, 400 DPI IMAGES EX ADELAIDE UNIVERSITY IMAGE FILE)
The video clip shows how the hidden micro code beneath the markings on the code page, is revealed. The video is for everyone but perhaps one person, in particular, should watch it carefully.
In this instance, I used a copy of the code that Nick Pelling of the Cipher Mysteries blog insisted should be used. He had been given it by Marcel Varallo, who had spent some time in Adelaide and had acquired his copy from a lady called Trish. Nick's assertions regarding the microcode have long been debunked. t seems that Nick is having difficulty understanding how the process works and in order to help him I took this video earlier this morning that demonstrates the methodology used, it couldn't be simpler. Read the notes below the video for more details.
The steps in the microcode recovery process are straightforward, but in order to make it as easy as possible, I have put them in big print:
1. PRINT OUT A COPY OF THE SOMERTON MAN CODE PAGE (VARALLO VERSION)
2. IT SHOULD BE PRINTED ON A REASONABLE QUALITY INKJET PRINTER AND AT THE BEST QUALITY SETTING. A LASER PRINTER LEAVES HEAT PAD IMPRESSIONS AND DISTORTS THE OUTPUT.
3. THE PAPER USED SHOULD BE BLEED PROOF, THIS KEEPS ANY INK SPREAD TO A MINIMUM AND GIVES A SHARPER/FINER END RESULT
4. AFTER PRINTING, ALLOW THE PIECE TO DRY 10 MINUTES SHOULD BE AMPLE. EVEN AT THIS STAGE, YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SEE THE OUTLINE OF LETTERS AND NUMBERS BENEATH THE MARKED OVER AREAS
5. IN THE VIDEO I USED AN EASEL AND BACKBOARD PLACING THE FRESHLY PRINTED CODE PAGE AGAINST THE BOARD ADDING A KITCHEN PAPER TOWEL BENEATH THE PRINTED PIECE TO SOAK UP ANY EXCESS FLUID THAT DRAINS FROM THE PROCESS.
6. USING A SMALL EYEDROPPER, DRIZZLE SOME CITRIC ACID, (LEMON JUICE) ONTO THE PAPER IMMEDIATELY ABOVE THE CROSSED LINES IN THIS CASE BUT YOU CAN CHOOSE ANY OF THE LETTERS, LINES, OR STAINED AREAS YOU PLEASE.
If this process is properly tested by following the steps on the process described here, then you will achieve the exact same result If you don't achieve the result then you can't have followed the process. and I suggest you read it through again.
An interesting aside note. Conventional wisdom has it that the use of infrared, luminescence or reflected, can at best only reveal 50% of obscured writing. The method used here seems to be closer to 80% but you should check it out for yourselves. If you start with a reasonably high-resolution image and use the process described here there seems no logical reason why it won't work for you.
Update
Following a comment from Jason, I decided to revisit the original Somerton Man Code Page image file as available from the Adelaide University Wiki:
This file is a 400 DPI and is the original from which all others were taken.
There have in the past been numerous instances of claims made to deliberately mislead people that some NEW SCANS had been found. That of course is quite an erroneous statement.
I used some of the techniques that I have either developed myself or had found examples of work of others.
The images below are from that 400 DPI Wiki image file and they show the presence of micro written letters and numbers even in the 400 DPI image from Adelaide University/ Adelaide Advertiser, I have treated them with Sodium Hypochlorite, a strong bleach solution.:
1. Crossed lines A:
2. Crossed Lines B
3. Side Markings:
Apart from the apparent letters/numbers within the letter R, the side markings at the edge of the page show up quite well/
PLEASE NOTE, NO OTHER PROCESSING WAS REQUIRED TO SHOW THE OUTLINES AND OME DETAIL OF THE MICRO WRITING. THE PHOTOGRAPHS HERE WERE TAKEN WITH MY MOBILE PHONE ONLY. THE IMAGES WERE TAKEN THROUGH PAINT .NET AND HAD CONTRAST ADJUSTMENT.
Can you put the page size/ dimensions up please, also would be good to know what resolution was the 1. Original image and 2. Was it rescanned at a higher resolution?
ReplyDeleteJason
Jason, the image size was approximately 110mm wide by 90mm deep. I say approximately because there was a small edge around it plus different printers can print out with slight size variations. The DPI in this case was 1200 dpi, the DPI standing for dots per inch which is the print resolution.
ReplyDeleteSOURCE OF THE IMAGE
The image itself was the one recommended by Nick Pelling and was sourced from a person named Varallo who, it appears sourced it from a lady named Trish.
It is exactly the same image file as that which you can download from the Adelaide University wiki here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamam_Shud_case#/media/File:SomertonManCode.jpg
The Adelaide University obtained their copy from the Adelaide Advertiser who in turn had obtained it from the SA Police department in 1949 as a printed photograph. The photograph had been taken using glass plate which was and still is regarded as a method that provides extremely fine detail. The Newspaper digitised all of their images in the early 1990s I understand. The image available from the Wiki shown is at 400 dpi, it was therefore rescanned at the higher print resolution.
1.Rescanning does not materially detract from the original image quality.
2.The norm for good quality images is 300 dpi.
3.Taking a photograph of the code page does not materially detract from the original image quality
If you have tested it for yourself that's to be applauded. Would love to hear of your results.