1947
The KGB in Australia at the time were busy recruiting spies and funneling their information back to the Motherland and Kasputin Yar.
Two Locations, one on either side of the ideological divide between East and West. On the left the site of KAPUSTIN YAR in Astrakhan Oblast (Soviet Union) and WOOMERA on the right, South Australia.
Kapustin Yar was situated around 18 hours by train and vehicle North East of Odessa. Odessa was the research and development centre with a major university focused on engineering and rocketry situated there. Odessa was also a development site for chemical weapons between 1946 and 1948
Woomera in South Australia had a similar profile in many ways. It, too, was situated some distance from Adelaide, just under 500 klms and 5.5 hour road trip today but in 1947, that would be more like 8 hours. The development work for the range took place in Salisbury just North of Adelaide at the Weapons Research Establishment with much technical work being done by Adelaide University.
According to records, both sites were decided upon in 1946 with works commencement on both in 1947. The Russians ran their first rocket engine test in December 1947 or thereabouts. Woomera was declared a Prohibited Zone in 1947, small rockets were tested there in 1947 with their first real launch in December 1949 according to some records.
As a matter of interest, the Russians test-fired 11 A4 rockets (that's captured German V2 rockets) at Kapustin Yar over a period of 12 months or more. 7 were fired successfully.
Both ranges were the only rocket test sites in each country at that time.
The KGB in Australia at the time were busy recruiting spies and funneling their information back to the Motherland and the scientists and technicians of Kasputin Yar.
THE INTELLIGENCE BACKDROP
As you might expect, the opposing sites were of great interest to both Soviets and the British and both sides would no doubt have had assets and resources applied to the task of gathering information of value and ensuring that it made its way to either Odessa or Adelaide.
We seem to have more information on just how the Soviets set up their intelligence networks in Australia at the time than we have on British/Australian methods for agents based in Astrakhan Blast.
SOVIET INTELLIGENCE ORGANISATIONAL DIAGRAM
The above describes at a high level, the communications network. This diagram would be massaged to better meet the needs of specific operations. For example, if a skilled assassin were to be brought in he would slot in next to the executive agent, he may act as the executive agent and carry out the task or he may be there in a training role.
In Australia, the head of the operation was Nosov. In ASIO records we see that Nosov had 4 agents working in South Australia in 1947/48. Two of these men were said to be Soviet agents, they would in all probability be 'illegals', they did not have any direct ties to the Soviet Embassy and would have used false names and forged papers. The other two agents were said to be Australian born but Russian by descent. Two agents were tasked with gathering intelligence on the Woomera range and the other two on the Weapons Research establishment works and people.
It would seem to be logical that the two 'illegals' would have been tasked with monitoring the works at Woomera range whilst the two Australian born agents would be engaged at Salisbury in intelligence gathering and recruiting.
11th November 1948 Barrier Miner |
The Woomera agents are a different proposition, unlike the Australian born agents, these men would not have the accents and perhaps conversational skills of the Salisbury team. I do not think they would have hidden themselves in the bush to observe the workings, far more likely that they were employed on the site. Followers of this blog may recall the newspaper article dated 11th November 1948 announcing the fact that 75 Balts were headed for Woomera:
Going back to the Organisational diagram. Given the nature of the setup, my thoughts are that the two X two men teams reported back to one local agent. In tradecraft terms, that agent would be a 'cut-out', the Resident or Group Leader. Meaning that the 'cut out' would in turn report to the next man in the chain, the Controller.
FEODOR NOSOV |
When it gets to the two 'illegals' that is entirely a different matter and whilst we may find them by searching through the ASIO files it will be a matter of luck to a great extent to find them.
VITALY PAVLOV
Let's be certain on this, we do not know whether the Pavlov at Lapstone was Vitaly Pavlov, but as a matter of interest, he arrived in Lapstone on 30th November and departed on 1st December which overlapped with the arrival of one Feodor Nosov, the head of the Sydney Office of the KGB at that time. Perhaps there was time for a quick operational review? I wouldn't have thought it was the done thing to have two high-end assets together in the same location for more than just a brief encounter, it might attract too much interest. We do not know for certain when he arrived in Australia.
Not sure how many got to watch the ABC programme, Final Renezvous? If you missed it, you'll find it on ABC iView:
ReplyDeletehttps://iview.abc.net.au/show/final-rendezvous,
Sadly I think it will have country of access limitations but fine if you are here in Australia. It will be available online until 10.39 pm, 10th September.
I will write some notes later today and post them as a comment here but I have to mention PeteDavo. Pete had been talking about one of the suspected characters in this movie for some time now and even though the documentary is set in the 1960s, the man Horrie Pile, was around in SMs time.
I watched the programme last night, It was well made in my view. Very familiar stories, Soviets, spies meeting etc. Stanislaw Kalinski/Kilinski found hanging from a tree in North Adelaide, and, surprise, surprise no i.d. found on his body and no one came forward to bury him, where have we seen this before? And all because he didn't complete his mission with 'Sylvia', he certainly knew he was being filmed at the wedding. Got me thinking if the SM was similarly disposed off by the Soviets for something that went awry in a meeting he was intending to have, but never happened? Clive
ReplyDeleteHi Clive, It was a well constructed programme, a proper documentary and not a soap opera account, refreshing!
ReplyDeleteWhen Stanislaw came out of the Church was a telling moment. His not so furtive glances ro the bank windows immediately posed the question, who did he talk to in the Church to make him do that? He hadn't looked at the bank before he went in so it looks like he was tipped off inside the Church building.
Did ASIO have someone inside the Church as part of the stakeout? Did the Soviets have someone in there? Maybe both?
The more you think about it the more possibilities you can see. The Soviets may well have known about the wedding ahead of time that would explain Stanislaw turning up with a camera, if the Soviets did that then planting someone close to or inside the Church would be a given.
The fact the ASIO operation was blown on day 1 and our man didn't turn up on day two speaks volumes.
There is still soemething to learn from day two and the timing on that day. It was busier, no wedding maybe but lots of people around. On both days there was plenty of cover.
It would appear to me that the local CPA branch in Adelaide coordinated the pick up. Pile made himself scarce by going on a holiday and tasked poor old Kilanski with doing the pick up. It would no be beyond reason to think that CPA members staked out the location just the same as ASIO did. The young bloke walking passed Mashall and checking her out may have been one. My initial thoughts though were that there was a tip off. But if there was a mole, then I'd think that the tip off would've occurred beforehand rather than during the event. If the CPA was so paranoid about exposure as to kill Stanislaw then it likely that "Keane" showing up in Adelaide risked whatever they were upto enough to take him out too. There was one Keane that had an ASIO file created in 1945. If the CPA believed that he was still under surveillance, then I could imagine that they'd be paranoid enough to want to keep that surveillance away from their operations, safe houses or operatives, and him showing up unexpectedly might of sealed his fate. If only they'd realised how much of a bumbling clown show that this Final Rendezvous exposed ASIO to be, then there'd be a few more families still living with found memories of their loved ones who lived into old age. And not living with the infamy of staged suicides.
ReplyDeletePeter Symon.
ReplyDeleteHis 1st (& 3rd) wife's maiden name is Marshall.
Probably irrelevant, but interesting none the less..
The People's Bookshop was at 29 Hindley St in 1949, by 1961 it was now located at 182 Hindley St. The expression on Kalinski's face, as he looked up at the camera, is worth a thousand words. He knew from then on he was a dead man walking. Clive
ReplyDeleteRe the Final Rendezvous video, a later post shows a video from 1956 in Adelaide with the same man, Stanislaw, is captured only this time he was riding a bicycle.
ReplyDeleteHaving read a deal more on the Kay Marshall case, it is clear that the Adelaide Surveillance operation was the result of 2 years hard work by ASIO which had some astonishing results regardless of the disappointment when the expected meeting failed to take place.
I have got a post underway on the subject as it provides a clearer picture of how both ASIO and the Russian Intelligence Services operated in the Cold War years. There are some amazing facts and imagery in the next post.