THE SUITCASE & BARBOURS WAXED THREAD
Note the different shape and artwork of this card as opposed to others of the same brand. |
Note that the two cards on the left state 'WAX THREAD' and the SM card states 'WAX THREADS' and a decorative design within the lower space. The two on the left also have 'Made in the United Kingdom across the base whilst the SM card has no space for any wording.
Here are more examples:
You can find more on the suitcase contents here... an old post, quite interesting for comparison.
The name on the card is a little misleading, the company that owned this brand was The Linen Thread Company. Established in the late 1700s by John Barbour, it rapidly grew to be an international company with factories in the USA and here in Australia. The company manufactured all kinds of linen threads, twines and even fishing lines.
They began their Australian manufacturing operation in late 1938 when a site was chosen in Sydney. Post war they expanded again to Victoria and Queensland.
They began their Australian manufacturing operation in late 1938 when a site was chosen in Sydney. Post war they expanded again to Victoria and Queensland.
1938 article |
The point I want to make here is that it was this thread that was relied upon to provide the only real physical evidence that the suitcase and therefore its contents, belonged to the Somerton Man. The repairs to the collar of the jacket, the pocket in the trousers and the button sewed back on the trousers, all apparently had the same thread as was found on the Barbours card in the suitcase. Cleland commented that it was a Sepia colour; it was a neutral colour that was readily available in Australia at the time.
Consider this, how easy would it be for a third party to quickly carry out the rudimentary repairs and then throw the Barbours card into the case? A 15-minute job tops. And for that effort, the hard evidence link was planted and everyone, myself included in the early days, just took it for granted. It is only since the revelation that the man was highly likely to have been assassinated with a typical Soviet MO that made me once again rethink my view on the suitcase some months ago.
Truth to be told I have never really felt comfortable with the idea that the case was filled with anything other than 'litter', placed there precisely because the waters would be seriously muddied, resources would be tied up and confusion would reign. It worked for more than 70 years.
For those interested, here's the high-resolution image, well sort of, that the Barbours Thread image came from:
And here is a close up of the brush, notice that it is a 'stubby' brush head:
The image on the right is of a modern-day equivalent, size 24 professional stencil brush.
Truth to be told I have never really felt comfortable with the idea that the case was filled with anything other than 'litter', placed there precisely because the waters would be seriously muddied, resources would be tied up and confusion would reign. It worked for more than 70 years.
For those interested, here's the high-resolution image, well sort of, that the Barbours Thread image came from:
AND HERE ARE THE OTHER 9 ITEMS
MAKING 14 IN TOTAL:
The orientation of the image commonly found on the web was more to do with the layout of various newspapers and their requirements. The original orientation was vertical as shown here. To accommodate that, the various tools were supported by pins (or snip if you spell it in reverse), I tried to give an extra clue! As you can see I have circled 9 separate pins, those 9 plus the 5 items make 14 items in total. I imagine it was Jimmy Durham taking the photographs.
And here is a close up of the brush, notice that it is a 'stubby' brush head:
The image on the right is of a modern-day equivalent, size 24 professional stencil brush.
26th MAY 2020
A very interesting ad cropped up in the Adelaide Advertiser in 1948, it awas looking for someone who had taken another's kitbag by mistake, the date was 29th November 1948. The finder was to contact the barman at the Strathmore Hotel:
The Strathmore had advertised for a Chef in early August and again in September 1948. You have to wonder who owned that kitbag and what was his name?
New images of the brush and group of tools now included in this post. A quick quiz, not including the board, how many items can you see in the 'group' image?
ReplyDeleteCongrats to 'Elite', not 5 but 14 in total. Need good eyes!
ReplyDeleteWho is 'Elite', apart from being another ex Copper, he is the person I was showing the images to in my studio, social distancing in place of course. So not an online commenter but an in person one.
ReplyDeleteAfter showing the image, I said to him if you can see all 14 items and point them out, then you'll be amongst the 'elite few' who understand how to examine photographs. In all fairness I did give him one clue and that was, The first question you should ask is 'How was this photograph taken?' and start from there. It took him ten minutes, but he got the picture, so to speak. Starting from that point it becomes a snip.
Gordon, I would also count the Masonic folder on which the items are arranged. That makes 15.
ReplyDeleteSure, I think it was mentioned that it was excluding the board but no problem with that. One item is odd, the scissors, there is I think, another supporting pin in there, I think I can see it, so I might adjust the image.
ReplyDeleteAn interesting update from November 1948, a missing kitbag but from a very interesting place..
ReplyDeletePETE BOWES, you should look here..
ReplyDeleteThank you, anonymous, I do remember this post but was and remain unable to grasp the logistics of having someone repair the clothing being worn by SM prior to leaving the thread card in the suitcase. Perhaps someone can enlarge upon the theme. Gordon, you up for it?
ReplyDeleteA fair bit on the plate right now Pete but here's what I think:
ReplyDeleteOn the basis that the man was being held prior to his death, the suitcase and its contents were, in my view could have been brought together during that time. Whoever did this had an eye for detail and wanted to tie the man to the suitcase, what better way than to have a small repair to the coat with some Barbour's thread which was then added to the contents. It then boils down to when was the suitcase deposited at the station?
Again this is how I see it. No one actually recalls seeing him at the Railway station, we have only a left luggage ticket showing the date stamp but not the time. I wouldn't think it would have been all that difficult to alter the stamping machine after the event. That's one option. There are others including that the repair to the coat was carried out after the event and the Barbour's card added to the suitcase after it was collected from the station. Normal procedure in my time was to have someone witness the handing over of the suitcase and signing off on the contents, it was certainly that way in the 60s and if anything it would be even more stringent now.
You'll have to forgive me if I take a while to respond, I really do have a lot on the plate at the moment, but I will do my best.
Thanks Gordon, it looks like we’re both heading in the same direction though by different transport ..
ReplyDeletePAT, I am sorry that you weren't able to log in on this page for some reason, there doesn't appear to be a fault but I will check. Just a correction to your comment on the CM blog. If you read through this post carefully you will see that specific mention is made of the threads being made in Sydney. Whilst Barbours Threads were made in Northern Island they were also made in New Zealand, the USA and elsewhere but all bore that Barbours Trade mark which contained the name of the town Lisburn. The company itself in a little town called Kilbarchan which last time I looked was still in Scotland and I am sure that you must have just overlooked it and I am not suggesting that you were actively misleading people. You can read Pats comments here:
ReplyDeletehttps://ciphermysteries.com/2022/08/28/john-russell-keane-jack-keane#comment-495538