...SOUTH AUSTRALIAN LEGAL AND CORONIAL SYSTEM
'A BOIL THAT NEEDS LANCING'...
IT APPEARS THAT YOUTUBE HAS REMOVED THE MANOCK UNDER INVESTIGATION VIDEO BUT IT IS STILL AVAILABLE ON CHANEL 9 STREAMING HERE:
...POINTS TO WATCH: 9 minutes 15 seconds, 14 minutes 40 seconds, 30 minutes and 30 seconds...
...There are many more issues raised and names named, watch this video right through, it is quite shocking...
In the previous post, we looked at the shocking case of Dr. Manock, the South Australian Pathologist who, over a period of almost 30 years carried out 10,000 autopsies and gave evidence in 400 criminal cases. Tim and again his evidence was found to be faulty, there are many cases where innocent people were imprisoned and cases when the guilty walked free.
In this video, you will hear how it was only when Manock's evidence went against the interests of the SA Police that notice was taken of Dr Manocks performance.
Disturbingly you will see evidence of the involvement of still-serving South Australian Judicial and Legal professionals who for reasons yet to be revealed, effectively covered up the misdeeds of Manock.
There is one segment in this video where Dr. Manock was described as being well-spoken, English, and well presented and that is how he influenced those who were to help conceal this man's dreadful actions. That rang a few bells.
Is it unreasonable to thnk that what we see in the Manock case is evidence of a corrupt culture that existed in South Australia during Manocks time and that culture may well have been in place for decades before Manocks appointment?
Below are images of the last 4 State Attorneys General for South Australia:
All these people have been approached in relation to the Manock case, and all have refused to take any further action.
The big question for the followers of the Somerton Man Case is was this culture embedded in the early to late 1940s? What do you think?
Absolutely. The Manock culture of corruption/incompetence would have existed in South Australia in the 1940's. Always had and always will.
ReplyDelete