tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2649149095048346117.post8017683826006679395..comments2024-03-29T01:32:42.553+11:00Comments on ....CARL/CHARLES WEBB WAS NOT THE SOMERTON MAN....: SOMERTON MAN: THE FOURTH RUBAIYATGordon332http://www.blogger.com/profile/17690592260936410432noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2649149095048346117.post-21503746268563163012017-08-28T16:05:33.476+10:002017-08-28T16:05:33.476+10:00Seems that she gave one answer according to the pr...Seems that she gave one answer according to the press at least. Has anyone ever seen a reference to this book elsewhere? Must admit I missed it and I had read this article. Keen eyed Clive!Gordon332https://www.blogger.com/profile/17690592260936410432noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2649149095048346117.post-8835455056481096932017-08-28T15:25:02.693+10:002017-08-28T15:25:02.693+10:00GC, according to Lawson, Jessica answered no to ev...GC, according to Lawson, Jessica answered no to every question.peterboweshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04383208822885209896noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2649149095048346117.post-31862401549584573812017-08-28T12:22:56.651+10:002017-08-28T12:22:56.651+10:00It's interesting because it sort of might reso...It's interesting because it sort of might resolve the problem around the Rubaiyat being found "some time in November". It might (for example) suggest that the fragment + book was used multiple times as an ID, with the book subsequently being discarded (and might even explain the discrepancy some have highlighted around "neatly trimmed" vs "torn"). Of course, in that case, it is possible that neither of the Rubaiyats discovered actually relate to Someron Man directly at all - but that there's another one still floating around somewhere Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com