NOTICES:



A WARNING: Those site visitors of Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander Culture should be aware that there are photographs and images of the deceased.


AFIO DISCLAIMER:
The author of this blog is a member of the Association of Former Intelligence Officers and as such the views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not represent the views and opinions of the Association of Former Intelligence Officers, its staff or Directors.

Learn more about the Association including membership requirements at www.afio.com.


The Somerton Man Case. The body of a man found on an Australian beach close to a major Atomic Testing ground, he was probably poisoned, a copy of the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam and an unbroken Code page found and associated to him. Set against a Cold War background in 1948, was this man a spy? We think so and this blog focuses on the evidence that was left behind and in some cases missed, the Code page, Dry Cleaning numbers, A Poem and a small, torn piece of paper bearing the words TAMAM SHUD.

Tuesday, 23 February 2016

Somerton Man: Police File Image of Code Page


The Real Deal? 

This Image is From Police Files & Not The Advertiser Newspaper


The difference between this image and the image that everyone uses, being the one from the Adelaide University Wiki which they in turn had obtained from the Adelaide Advertiser, is that you will see the actual weave of the paper on which the letters were written.

It has long been thought that this particular image was no longer in existence but now here it is.

Where did I get it from? I can tell you that I received it in an envelope and it was postmarked Adelaide and I have had it for some months. I think you may be surprised at its origins.

I have taken some UV close up images and they are revealing. A sample few are below in this post.


Here you can clearly see the differences, the top version is sharp whilst this one shows the letters but not quite as sharp and you certainly cannot see the weave in this version. You are able to download the full Advertiser version of the code page from this blog or from the Adelaide University Wiki.














What intrigued me most though was the appearance of the weave in the paper, I am doing some further research on that and will post the results in due course. Pete Bowes at TomsByTwo, we should discuss this.

Some sample UV light close ups for your comments:


If you decide to examine this new page, I will make it available shortly, then in taking any images especially under UV light it is important to remember to alter the direction and angle of the light and the camera, you will be able to capture a lot more due to the nature of UV lighting and how it works.



In the image above, the end of line 2 on the page, there are a number of examples and they are very small as you can see.


Two images of the X lines in the centre of the code page, here you can see numbers and letters closely packed to form the lines so that they are not 'lines' but lines of code.

 This is the raw image without being scrubbed, If you look at the thicker area of the lower crossed line, that's where we are focusing the attention.











The image of the same section has been 'scrubbed and you should be able to make out a series of numbers and letters in the thicker section.


The next 2 images are of the lines closer to the Letter X which crosses both lines.

 Here you can probably make out the darker shapes in the upper line.












Below you can can see definite numbers and letters closely packed in the scrubbed version.


I am currently working on the letters themselves and will post them when ready.

One last image, those who have followed the various posts on the Laundry Marks may be interested in this image. It is the original Police image prior to it being marked over:





4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi Gordon, Fascinating stuff! It's like examining a close up photo of the Moon's surface and finding signs of intelligent life-Clive

Anonymous said...

Hi Gordon, Was it "G F" who sent u the image?-Clive

Gordon332 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Gordon332 said...

No, not gf.Can you send me your email?